Effect of Control-Ring on LiTaO3 Domain Inversion
by Electron Beam Irradiation

Makoto Minakata, Haruyuki Awano and Yoshikazu Nakada
Research Institute of Electronics, Shizuoka University
3-5-1 Johoku, Hamamatsu 432-8011, JAPAN
Phone & Fax : +81-53-478-1336
E-mail : h-awano@rie.shizuoka.ac.jp


@Abstract - The control-ring was drawn on LiTaO3 crystal utilizing various electronic density before a small-dot drawn. The size of inversion domains was zero under the condition of no ring, 13ƒÊm under the condition of middle density, and 29ƒÊm under the high density. Thus, we can confirm "the interaction of Coulomb" induced by the injected electrons.


I. INTRODUCTION

@We have been studying the formation of nanometer scale inversion domains in LiTaO3 using electron beam (EB) irradiation(1). Therefore, a control of nanometer scale domain inversion realizes new opto-electronic devices such as an ultrahigh density memory(2) (`1 Tb/cm2).
@In this paper, we report for the first time "the interaction of Coulomb" caused by the electrons impinging into a crystal by EB irradiation. Actually we showed the existence of "the interaction of Coulomb" between a small-dot and a surrounding ring (control-ring) which is drawn with various electronic density before a small-dot drawn.


II. EXPERIMENT

II-1. Electron beam irradiation mode and domain structure

@The experimental setup for EB scanning is composed of a scanning electron microscope (SEM), a pattern generator and a computer. The beam spot is 10 nm in diameter, and the irradiated position is controlled by 10 nm(1). We used a LiTaO3 crystal of 500ƒÊm thickness and the +Z surface was coated with Au film. The free -Z surface is irradiated with a scanned EB. The EB acceleration voltage, current and clock were 20 kV, 200 pA and 1`30,000, respectively. Clock means electron irradiation time. "Clock 1" is correspond to 0.5ƒÊs. Therefore "clock 30,000" is equivalent to 15 ms. After chemical etching, the pit on +Z surface is observed because etching rate of the -Z face is much higher than that of the +Z face. Consequently, the pit size is corresponding to the inversion domain area(3).
@There was no etching pattern when a point was drawn at clock 30,000 (Fig.1(a)). When the small rectangle patterns were drawn at clock 30,000, domain inversions were not occurred less than 540 nm square patterns. In the case of 2ƒÊm to 550 nm square, it was obtained the circular inverted patterns which size were 150`6ƒÊm in diameter (Fig.1(b)). When the 8ƒÊm line & space pattern was drawn in 500ƒÊm square, the domain inversion occurred in segmented regions(3) (Fig.1(c)).


II-2. Domain structure using control-ring

@The control-ring was drawn with the size of 50ƒÊm in inside diameter and 10ƒÊm in width utilizing various electronic density. Subsequently the small rectangle pattern was drawn. After etching, the pit size on +Z surface was zero under the condition of no ring, 13ƒÊm under the condition of middle density (clock 1), and 29ƒÊm under the high density (clock 8), as shown in Fig.2. Thus, we can confirm "the interaction of Coulomb" induced by the injected electrons. At this point, we considered the strength for the interaction of Coulomb(4).




III. DISCUSSION


@It has been discovered that the relation between the quantity of the charges by EB irradiation V and the size of etch pit (inverted region) D is able to be expressed by using the cone model(3). It is considered that the charge distribution of irradiated/injected electrons is formed the shape of cone which has a fixed vertical angle a. By using this model, there are two threshold at domain inversion, one is the nuclear formation threshold hn (= 204 kV/cm) and the other is the inversion area enlarged threshold hth (= 120 kV/cm)(3). In domain inversion using EB irradiation, when an electric field value induced by injected electrons is higher than the value of hn, a domain inversion occurs and the area of inverted domain is enlarged until the induced field is less than the value of hth.
@Fig.3 shows the interaction of Coulomb between small dot and control-ring by using two threshold. Under the condition of "no control-ring", insufficient charge density did not induce the domain inversion. As the surface resistivity on the crystal reduces on the electron irradiated area, irradiated electrons may be able to move. The charges irradiated into the center of the control-ring is gathered toward the center by the interaction of Coulomb. As an electric field value induced by injected electrons is higher than the value of hn, a domain inversion occurs and the area of inverted domain is enlarged until the induced field is less than the value of hth. More excessive charges extend the inversion area of center dot by means of more stronger interaction. In the area on the control-ring, domain inversion may partially occur, because an electric field value is higher than the value of hn.
@In the cone model, it has been considered that the cone has a fixed vertical angle. However, this angle may be changed in consequence of using control-ring.
@In Fig.1(c), to draw the line pattern by EB, it needs to consider the interaction of Coulomb as shown in Fig.4. It has been explained that charges on 2 lines repel each other(3). This explanation is supported by the experiment of line pattern drawing.



IV. CONCLUSION

@In the domain inversion by EB irradiation, we report for the first time "the interaction of Coulomb" caused by the electrons impinging into a crystal. Actually we showed the existence of "the interaction of Coulomb" between a small-dot and a control-ring.


REFERENCES

(1) M. Minakata, Y. Nakada and H. Awano, Extended Abstracts (The 44th Spring Meeting,1997); The Japan Society of Applied Physics and Related Societies. 30p-NF-12.

(2) M. Minakata, Y. Nakada and T. Nomura, Proceedings of JICAST'98/CPST'98, 245-248(1998).

(3) M. Minakata, Y. Nakada and H. Awano, Bulletin of the Research Institute of Electronics Shizuoka University, 32,49-57

(4) M. Minakata, Y. Nakada and H. Awano, Extended Abstracts (The 60th Autumn Meeting,1999); The Japan Society of Applied Physics. 2p-ZB-5.

‹ÆÑƒŠƒXƒg‚É–ß‚é